<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: February Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/</link>
	<description>Country Are The New Pseud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roswitha</title>
		<link>http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>roswitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Sense and Sensibility is possibly Austen&#039;s dodgiest novel - I think it&#039;s deeply unpleasant, but I&#039;m still not sure if its because it lacks the relative clarity of Austen&#039;s purpose in her other work [only Mansfield Park is more ambiguous about its characters and it is a much more solid piece of writing] or if Austen really meant for it to be that misanthropic. Now I expect you don&#039;t have a problem with misanthropy, but it&#039;s not always on par with Austen&#039;s more civilising instincts as a novelist imho. 

I hope you do read Mansfield Park at some point of time. 

[Also - surely you meant &#039;case&#039; and not &#039;crate&#039;? Or is there another brilliant novel with &#039;crate&#039; in its name?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sense and Sensibility is possibly Austen&#8217;s dodgiest novel &#8211; I think it&#8217;s deeply unpleasant, but I&#8217;m still not sure if its because it lacks the relative clarity of Austen&#8217;s purpose in her other work [only Mansfield Park is more ambiguous about its characters and it is a much more solid piece of writing] or if Austen really meant for it to be that misanthropic. Now I expect you don&#8217;t have a problem with misanthropy, but it&#8217;s not always on par with Austen&#8217;s more civilising instincts as a novelist imho. </p>
<p>I hope you do read Mansfield Park at some point of time. </p>
<p>[Also - surely you meant 'case' and not 'crate'? Or is there another brilliant novel with 'crate' in its name?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunal</title>
		<link>http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wokay.in/2010/03/02/february-reading/#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>Orson Scott Card is a much better writer of short fiction than he is of novels. Ender&#039;s Game is his best novel precisely because it is an expansion of a short story (also called Ender&#039;s Game). If you liked it you should read his short story anthologies and maybe Intergalactic Medicine Show but for the love of Joseph Smith do not get sucked into the rest of the Ender series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orson Scott Card is a much better writer of short fiction than he is of novels. Ender&#8217;s Game is his best novel precisely because it is an expansion of a short story (also called Ender&#8217;s Game). If you liked it you should read his short story anthologies and maybe Intergalactic Medicine Show but for the love of Joseph Smith do not get sucked into the rest of the Ender series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
